The Seven Deadly Sins – Theology Style

Theology Forum has a great post adapting the seven deadly spiritual sins of St. John of the Cross to the sinful tendencies nearly inherent in the theological enterprise. I particularly appreciated his comments on ‘avarice’ as the tendency to use academic work as a stand-in for true spiritual development. An apropos warning for anyone engaged in academic research. And his warning about ‘justification through quoting” was great! For those of you working on research projects and theses, although I like a good quotation as much as the next person, remember that quotation is never a substitution for argumentation; a good quote cannot make a weak argument better, just more interesting to read.

I think he should have given a little more thought to the problem of ‘sloth’ in theology. His comments on the laziness involved in shirking our responsibility to do theology in service of the church were helpful. There is a flipside to this, though, when theologians evidence sloth by refusing the hard work of engaging in theological reflection and writing. One can easily fall into the trap of thinking that such work is merely ‘abstract’ when it does not obviously relate to some pressing concern of the church. Working as the church to make sure that we are thinking, speaking, and acting in a manner appropriate to Gospel-transformed people is always a pressing concern, and doing it well requires that we devote ourselves to the hard work of biblical and theological research and writing.

I’d be curious to know what you think about his seven theological sins. Which do you find yourself struggling with the most? Which do you see as most common among American evangelical students engaged in biblical and theological studies?

Comments

comments

One Response to “The Seven Deadly Sins – Theology Style”

  1. JohnMark January 22, 2009 at 12:38 am #

    For me it would probably be envy and avarice. There is nothing quite liek the feeling of working out an idea for months on end only to pick up a book and discover that another wrote a far better explanation of my once original thought. However, this leads into the next one because I can take the frustration and turn it into a footnote and so be justified before my peers.

Leave a Reply:

Gravatar Image